-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 19:44, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/30/06, Tels <nospam-abuse(a)bloodgate.com>
wrote:
So, if you can't guarantee that the hashes of
the IP (including the
log) don't leak out, how can you guarantee that the secret doesn't leak
out? Answer: You can't.
The only safe way to not leak these information out is not even to
store them.
Silly, you store the hashes but not the secret.
The machine doing the hashes needs to know the secret and to make a
meaningfull analysis, you can't change it. (Well, maybe you could change it
once a month).
Still the secret is there and it can be leaked, subpoenaed or just plain be
sent out by a SNAFU.
best wishes,
tels
- --
Signed on Thu Aug 31 07:46:25 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at
http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on
http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"Naturally the parameter and boundary of their respective position and
magnitude are naturally determinable up to the limits of possible
measurement as stated by the general quantum hypothesis and Heisenberg's
uncertainty principle, but this indeterminacy in precise value is not a
consequence of quantum uncertainty. What this illustrates is that in
relation to indeterminacy in precise physical magnitude, the micro and
macroscopic are inextricably linked, both being a part of the same
parcel, rather than just a case of the former underlying and
contributing to the latter." -- Peter Lynd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRPZ4GXcLPEOTuEwVAQIVhQf/R/sYTXxhV7EfnIa8M0izXy/Dg0/E0m+r
w8W40Sqkgic//6MOFBt1mc3/OzPntFU/RL0UOGEhFYGItdD88GVpAMWNfB7zW0w1
Tq3KDar6agP5bTuoRzLghKcdzYB2/3a/aigidHcvCJoUI4B0TuYwXe10hgHGofXH
OWKZPTQgAafzpMD4SjxyMm7hSCOPNtzMPsr0TZhTkVIiZfX+gKFlgz8W9HWzMsCH
Bn91J/1eVfpnRfXH49ATPfmyGwcjPi3FpIU7czFeJjCzRDcP/UFIQyw0ysJoU+/O
/F+dWN5eFYes/93pbp/dYHkqQRDHqPY5IS5npYEUzejEmT24sXu+Tw==
=klKo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----