On 5/8/06, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
Your tool is an experiment? Is intended to be included in media wiki?
Experiment is the right word for it. I've identified a lot of uses for it,
and the talk pages on Wikipedia are an ideal typification of why it would be
valuable. Like most online communication tools it's designed to facilitate
communication between individuals, but has no built in facilities for the
organization of thoughts, nor for the aggregation of the participant's ideas
into a single central consensus.
This is especially true for the wikipedia, where one discussion page is
being used to determine the consensus on a myriad of ideas presented in any
single entry. I think it would be an excellent proving grounds for the
tool.