On 9/17/07, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2) there
should be another, similar, tag for "real" footnotes. <note>
would be great. They would operate identically to (1).
Do you just want the ability to make two citation-like lists per
article whereas you can make one now? If that's the case wouldn't a
system where you can make and flush an arbitrary number of lists be
better?
How many are we likely to want? Enough that general-purposing the
mechanism (rather than a second instance) makes sense?
3) named REFs
can have another parameter, "page=". These would be
collected into the references at the bottom, with each lettered
reference appearing.
A variation of this has already been suggested and I believe there's
an open bug for it. "category" or "section" is more agnostic to the
format being cited than "page" although I guess all could be provided.
How about 'specific="page 45-47"'; that way you can put in whatever
internal location specification makes contextual sense given the media
being referred to...
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com