William Pietri wrote:
That was my first thought, but I notice in
Praveen's link that chillu-k
has no Unicode 5.0 representation. It's described as "not very common",
so maybe this isn't a big deal, but is your thinking just to store (and
transmit) the 5.1 code for chillu-k, while converting the rest to 5.0?
Or is their some Malayalam typographical convention that is used now
that we should honor instead?
William
Some fonts were used a method to draw chillu-k without unicode
specification, that was same as other chillu construction ( 0D15,
0D4D, 200D - ka, virama, zwj). Zero width joiner in these definitions
itself cause some problems in searching. Mediawiki not including zwj in
its search result. Please check attachment. Usually search engines like
google or yahoo also not including zwj in their result.
My note about IE6 is not correct. IE6 can render Unicode 5.1 chillu in
normal pages. But some problem in editbox and title bar. (I am using
ubuntu - I am not directly aware of this problem)
Praveen