On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Brion Vibber <brion(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I just want to point out this is a *totally valid* and
*very valuable*
approach -- sometimes knowing that something would be hard or impossible
to do with the current internals is a needed kick in the pants to
refactor something.
Yup. I'd never have thought of moving classes to the <a>, having been
so long indoctrinated into "it's not possible to use literal <a>s in
wikimarkup". It's a valuable idea. :)