Hi, cool, I was actually expecting someone to come out with
suggestions like this. Indeed I didn't know that and now I do. In fact
closer cooperation with cluebot is on TO-DO :-) any good algorithm to
calculate vandalism is appreciated, in fact this might be the first
thing we should create hooks for, so that people can implement own
algorithms as either c++ or python plugins which count the score just
as they like... (unfortunately I didn't manage to get python engine
working for windows build yet)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Antoine Musso <hashar+wmf(a)free.fr> wrote:
Le 19/09/13 11:35, Petr Bena a écrit :
<snip>
Huggle 3 comes with vandalism-prediction as it is
precaching the diffs
even before they are enqueued including their contents. Each edit has
so called "score" which is a numerical value that if higher, the edit
is more likely a vandalism.
If you want to help us improve this feature, it is necessary to define
a "score words" list for every wiki where huggle is about to be used,
for example on English wiki.
Each list has following syntax:
(see
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Huggle/Config&diff…)
The good thing while reinventing the wheel, is that you can reuse
existing material :-]
Cluebot-NG has such a list:
http://review.cluebot.cluenet.org and its a
quite active one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ClueBot_NG
It uses a variety of algorithms to determine the score of an edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot_NG#Vandalism_Detection_Algorithm
Maybe get in touch with them and reuse their engine?
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l