Yes, that's what I was saying. "that would exclude".
--node
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:11:19 +0200, Yann Forget <yann(a)forget-me.net> wrote:
Hi,
Le Sunday 19 September 2004 07:19, Mark Williamson a écrit :
If you were looking for "dead languages" and conlangs, that would
exclude Breton, Faroese, Latvian, Kashubian, and Nynorsk (Nynorsk is
basically an official codification of rural SW Norwegian speech forms,
it can hardly be considered a conlang).
Breton is not a dead language.
There are schools where children are teached mathematics and history in
Breton.
cf. look Diwan at Google
i.e.
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/diwan.bro.roazhon/
best,
node
Regards,
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
http://fr.wikipedia.org/ | Encyclopédie libre
http://www.forget-me.net/pro/ | Formations et services Linux
Pawel wrote:
MW> If you were looking for "dead
languages" and conlangs, that would
MW> exclude Breton, Faroese, Latvian, Kashubian, and Nynorsk (Nynorsk is
MW> basically an official codification of rural SW Norwegian speech forms,
MW> it can hardly be considered a conlang).
Kashubian is not a dead language. There are still many native speakers
in Kashubia.