julien tayon wrote:
Yes but shoud we present the fact that it is
legitimate to think Shoah
never existed, or shoud we state (arbitrary) that revisionism is a far
rightist theory that Shoah never existed. Can you tell me which can be
written in wikipedia, and why ?
I think we can (and should) say that the theory that "Shoah never
existed" is held only by a very tiny minority of people, and that no
notable historian takes such claims seriously.
We absolutely should _not_ act as if holocaust revisionism and
standard history are equally valid. To do so would itself be a
perversion of NPOV.
--Jimbo