On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Guaka wrote:
"Every
single person on the planet" is a bit of rhetoric, but a serious
bit of rhetoric. I will feel that this mission is complete if we have
an encyclopedia written in enough languages so that 99.99% of all people
_who are able to read in some language_ can read a Wikipedia.
African language Wikipedias aren't very useful for this goal. Most
Africans who are able to read are able to read in some colonial language
(fr, en, pt, es, ar). In Bamako you have to look hard to find books,
papers, or anything written not in French...
I think actually that the mission is complete if people who are not able
to read in some language are included. By using text-to-speech synths
and voice recognition anybody who can either read or hear could access
Wikipedia. Otherwise some 80% of Mali's population is excluded from the
mission.
The fact that there is more information available in people's mother
tongue will be an incentive to actually learn to read (and write) in
that language. But the same would count for Zeelandic or Limburgish,
actually. The difference is the literacy rate and the (dis)similarity
between the written and non-written languages.
On the other hand, I think it's worth noting that if promoting literacy
and delivering encyclopedia content to the illiterate (worthy goals to
be sure, but primary goals for other projects, or for the future after
Jimbo's stated primary goal is already met) actually hinders the goal
Jimbo has elucidated here, it's something that should probably be on the
back burner. The Wikipedia project can't be everything to everyone: we
should ensure that it's successful at being something for someone,
though, and that requires a certain narrowing of focus.
The originally intended focus of it strikes me as a good choice.
--
Chad Perrin
[ CCD CopyWrite |
http://ccd.apotheon.org ]