Anthere wrote:
Is that censorship ?
Well... self-censorship, perhaps.
But
* the day clitoris pictures are put on the english wikipedia without
causing an uproar (because clitoris are shoking and might get
wikipedia censored in schools)
* the day we can put ethnic statistics on the french wikipedia without
causing an uproar (because "races" do not exist and publishing stats
might get wikipedia shut down for publishing illegal information)
You should note that the clitoris pictures currently are, and have been
for upwards of a year, included in the English Wikipedia.
Also, nobody has seriously suggested removing them: the argument has
been over whether to have them inline or linked. There is no measurable
support for actually suppressing their availability, so I don't see the
similarity---they will be there in some shape or form regardless of
which side in the argument prevails.
-Mark