So? For example the entire concept of an article about the country of
Macedonia angers many Greek people. Since when was the fact that
someone could get angry about something an argument not to do
something?
/Andreas
On 3/13/06, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's already been proposed, and it seems like a
good idea.
The only troubling part of your proposal is that data could be stored
in the database in Cyrillic, which I think might anger some Romanians.
Mark
On 12/03/06, Neil Harris <usenet(a)tonal.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Caroline Ford wrote:
There seems to be no way that Romanians will
tolerate cyrillic language
(even via a software setting) on their wikipedia.
Caroline/secretlondon
Okay, then.
Let the ro: and mo: Wikipedias be interfaces to the same underlying
data, then but let the Wikipedia be a Cyrillic-free zone, both in terms
of content and interface, and mo: Wikipedia be the same as ro:, only
with interface and content optionally presented in Cyrillic, with
two-way transliteration for editing, as per the Chinese and Serbian
Wikipedias.
-- Neil
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
"Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l