Yes, however that difference in usage isn't specific to simplified vs.
traditional. Even in the traditional Chinese domain, one can use
either term.
It seems the community places hope that a technical solution will
eventually be found so that there is automatic mapping of characters
so that something less than a complete fork is necessary. This will
happen only after ZH is accessible again and Chinese-knowledgeable
developers can pitch in.
-Andrew
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:01:11 +0200, Philip Newton <philip.newton(a)gmx.net> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:58:01 +0800, Andrew Lih wrote:
the latter is about visual appearance of
logographic characters.
(And minor changes in vocabulary, but as I understand it, not more than
between British and American English - e.g. diannao vs. jisuanji for
computer.)
Cheers,
Philip
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l