--- julien tayon <julien(a)tayon.net> wrote:
I see a point, what we try to improve is not space
or memory usage. The
point is to promote NPOV. Don't you think that the
opposite of
objectivity is subjectivity, so to say being both
the topic and the
writer, or the judge and the trialed.
I don't it is possible for anyone to write about
himself
�objectively� therefore the behaviour in itself is
flawed. Having NPOV
articles also means promoting NPOV behaviour.
It is my opinion and I agree with it. ;)
That is quite a good opinion imho dear Jul
But just to put things back into perspective
The article is stating
*the date and place of birth of the man
*states he is a paintor
*cite books published and movies made
To be blunt, that is a perfectly *factual* (and rather
boring imho) article. There are no opinions cited. No
statement about the quality of his paintings or
anything similar.
hard to see what pov could be there...even if written
by the artist himself.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com