On Monday 02 June 2003 02:33, Toby Bartels wrote:
[Note: This is posted to both <wikitech-l> and
<wikipedia-l>
to preserve continuity; replies should go to <wikipedia-l>.]
thanks.
This isn't entirely true; the more paranoid must
still check the less
paranoid. But Wikipedia needs to make it easy by separating out the "fair
use" pics and not claiming any longer that they are being distributed under
the GFDL.
or we stay GFDL (as the FAQ says) and link the "fair use" pics which
contradict the spirit of the GFDL externally. I would love to see the core of
Wikipedia staying free in the sense that you can say to everyone, take the
whole article (text+pics) and do with it whatever you want.
As for brief quotations, well, I knew that the GNU
licences
would come back to bite us someday, but I expected 50 years from now
(hopefully *after* current copyright law became impossible to maintain).
I never thought they would prove to be inadequate so soon!
Surely RMS thought of brief quotations, one hopes?
The problem is that the GFDL main purpose was for technical documentation.
This license was never invented for an encyclopedia-like project.
Perhaps we can use the "invariant section" from the GFDL in order to ensure
that quotations are not modified. IMHO this would be sufficent to make quotes
compatible with GFDL.
best regards,
Marco