John Lee a écrit:
It was just an example. I was citing the English
Wikipedia as an example
because I frequent it the most, but my point was, why was such a useful
change not mentioned anywhere on any Wikipedia? (I didn't even ask for
the discussions to occur on any particular language's Wikipedia - that
was putting words in my mouth.) Wouldn't announcing it make changes go
more smoothly? I never implied this should be discussed on any
Wikipedia. Note that the English Community Portal often links to meta
discussions. If the change is as useful (or not) as it is, it should
have at least been linked to on every Wikipedia so that people could
have a chance to weigh in at meta, or at least be informed.
There are 50 active wikipedias. Between Jimbo, Angela and I, we only
manage 2 languages. We could go up to 15 languages by using google
translations probably.
I do not think it would be very efficient that Angela and I go in turn
on 25 wikipedias each of us to add a paragraph poorly translated to
explain what is currently going on.
Perhaps a more efficient way would be that people interested register to
the appropriate mailing list, or that simply, some people take the time
to make the information travel.
As for clandestine activities, that was another, well,
I think you can
only call it strawmanning. I never mentioned their names - I think
highly of Jimbo and Angela (I don't know Anthere well enough). It's just
rather odd and a bit annoying that the majority of editors who could and
would benefit from this still aren't informed, because they don't
subscribe to the mailing list.
Strawmanning... hummm.
Clandestine activities...hummm.
Let's see.
You can follow our activities everyday on meta :
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special%3ARecentchanges
on wikimediafoundation :
http://wikimedia.org/wiki/Special%3ARecentchanges
on the mailing list
on the foundation mailing list (please, register :-))
And on
irc.freenode.net, #wikimedia.
I must be actively connected 6 to 8 hours a day
Angela even more because she has an online job, while I cant connect
from my job
Jimbo is there everyday as well
And these past weeks, Tim is there everyday
Also, we are currently working very hard to keep you all informed of
what we do, through a newsletter. It should be published in a few day :
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Translation_requests/NL-1/En%3A#2
I do think the accusation of clandestine activities is very unpleasant.
Even if people here think we did the wrong thing, even if you do not
know me, I would hope that you assume we acted in good faith.
As far as I am concerned, I am all opened on any suggestion on what to
do to improve public awareness on what we do. I am also opened to any
suggestion on how information may circulate among all of us. I am also
opened to any offer to help us for any topic.
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
John Lee wrote:
The sentiment is dittoed here. I don't have a
clue what all this
hoo-ha is about, but that fact alone seems to suggest that something
clandestine occurred. From what I understand, this is something that,
if worked out correctly, *could* be beneficial to all the Wikipedias.
So why haven't I heard anything about this on en.wikipedia.org? It's
not even on the Community Portal. And the fact that someone as
even-headed as mav is even thinking about quitting makes me wonder
just what's going on.
John Lee
([[User:Johnleemk]] on En)
Christopher Mahan wrote:
<snip>
Not hearing things on en:wikipedia is akin to not hearing it on
nl:wikipedia. En:wikipedia may be the biggest wikipedia, it is not the
platform for discussions regarding Mediawiki. It is Meta's purpose to
discuss these things. The suggestion that something "clandestine"
occured does speak of little respect for the integrity of people like
Jimbo, Angela, Anthere ..
Thanks,
GerardM