It might get some action in the short term, but at what cost? What Fae just
proposed is to make Wikimedia a reputational risk. This would scare people
away from open access potentially doing long term damage.
I don't have a magic bullet, but this kind of approach is decidedly
worrying.
In the meantime I can try to contact an appropriate curator. If we can get
them onside that is the first step.
On 28 Jul 2017 13:25, "Andy Mabbett" <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 13:11, Richard Nevell
<richard.nevell(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Attempting to embarrass the British Museum is
misguided and certainly
would
not build bridges for future collaboration.
Perhaps, but as Fae indicates, it might also cause some movement.
What's your - WMUK's, I mean - alternative proposed action?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk