I second both Aphaia and Mark
IRC is much better for communication
but we do use regular phone call conferences between 2-3 users to
communicate as well, I don't prefer to have large scale conferences through
this method or Skype.
Mido
On Dec 22, 2007 1:49 AM, Aphaia <aphaia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Concur with Markie. IRC has the larger capacity than
skype and its
client is free. If you mean the voice chat, instead of text base
conversation, as a non native speaker of English, and as Transcom
chair, regarding the potential translation, I strongly oppose to have
our regular meeting on voice chat.
On Dec 22, 2007 8:15 AM, Wikinews Markie <newsmarkie(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
right, i know im not mido :-) but i want to say a
few things.
On Dec 21, 2007 10:29 PM, simonpedia <simon(a)cols.com.au> wrote:
> Look, would you consider using skype for
some of these discussions?
>
> I'm not really used to using it a lot but it would seem friendlier
than
IRC (by itself)
Have put a link to a Skypecast room I just set up, on this page
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group (bottom
right)
It could be left open all the time, if it's a
useful thing. I can send
the
password if yu want.
hmm skype, comercial and requires downloads. also its not used by CPG
and
IMO irc is fine and is used by many people to
communicate normally. you
have also been informed before of the different options of how to use
IRC
and to me it just seems like you want to use this
because its convienent
for
you but its not to me so hey we go round in
circles, but why change??
--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English):
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l