We are not discussing if the viewpoints are right or wrong. We are discussing that both
parties should have the same rights to express their viewpoints. The contradicting idea to
this article is not a minority point of view by the way. It seems like a minority point of
view, because of the unfair practice of protecting armenian sided views without giving the
turkish side the chance to express.
Cihan
geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 29/03/2008, Steve Summit wrote:
Erhan Akan wrote:
Hi wikipedia! We think your "Armenian
Genocide" document is not neutral.
Please make it editable.
1. It is editable. (However, you need to be a registered user.)
2. I fear I'll regret saying this, but: he's right. Other than
knowing it's among Wikipedia's most highly-contested articles,
I'd never paid much attention to it. Skimming it now, however,
I see that the opposing POV is given *very* short shrift.
There isn't even a "Controversy" section. The only place I
can find mention of the opposing POV is in the "Republic of
Turkey and the Armenian Genocide" section, and even there,
most of the text consists of fairly blunt denial of the
non-genocide claim.
Per minority viewpoints that would be correct yes. And even Turkish
denial is starting to slip.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
---------------------------------
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total
Access, No Cost.