Durova said quite clearly on wikipedia that the response from the 5 ranged
from possitive to entheusiastic.
On 11/29/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 12:26 PM, Charlotte Webb <charlottethewebb(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 11/28/07, SlimVirgin
<slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> As others have pointed out, the five editors she discussed it with may
> not even realize themselves who they are, because Durova may have
> mistaken no objections for positive feedback -- or she may have
> thought that feedback about her case study was the same as feedback
> about a block. So the implication that there are five editors
somewhere
in
hiding, letting Durova face the music alone, misses the point that
they may have said X, but Durova heard Y. There is therefore no point
in conducting a witchhunt.
For once, Slim, I hope one of your explanations is correct. Of course
nobody will
really know for sure unless they have a generally accurate idea
as to what, if anything, was actually said.
Actually, you do know for sure. Matt said it, Guy said it, Slim said
it, and I'm sure they all "have a generally accurate idea as to what,
if anything, was actually said."
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l