Gregory Maxwell said:
On 5/18/05, Tony Sidaway
<minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com> wrote:
Not quite. Most of the nominations seemed to be
of rather recent
articles--one was only two days old and quite a decent stub,
considering.The older articles tended to show signs of organic growth.
There are about twenty actual examples, with dates and history link,
here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Schools#The_schools_table
Right, most of them are new, but not all.
What initially caught my attention were the less excusable ones.
What initially caught my attention was the apparently indiscriminate
nature of the listing.
I'm sure there are, heaven forbid, notable schools
in wikipedia too.
But it seems that no one is nominating them for VFD.
Notability is not really definable. Jimbo has even suggested that it's a
proxy for verifiability.