On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:40 AM,
brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewhaha(a)edmc.net>wrote;wrote:
a.. 2007-09-05T20:26:03 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Muhammad ? (moved
Talk:Muhammad
to Talk:Muhammad raped little children, and he was a known prostitute, aka
male whore. He worshiped Satan and sacrificed babies in his name.)
Okay...This is about the worst I hav found, and it does not go under the
heading of common assault. So, where is this stuff where Jeremy Hanson
makes
threats about doing things like this? Overall, he seems like a bot that
likes moving things to "HAGGER????". Under verizon's acceptable use
policy,
if they were enforcing it, yes, he could find himself and his mother
disjoined from the internet. Under the law though, it is not common
assault,
so that hoped-for visit from feds is not likely. Hate-crimes? I did not
look
there, yet. They are not big in the western world. Remember the cartoons
published? So, in total, I think range blocks are the best way to go.
People
with IDs will still be able to edit from verizon, and in fact people can
obtain IDs via-e-mail, so I think "collateral damage" is a strong term for
unintentional and temporary blocks. This will let the clerks nail down all
of Grawp's accounts before he creates new ones. In a world of rampant
excellence, verizon's users will ask verizon why, and verizon will ask
someone at wikipedia in turn. Where is the common assault?
You clearly haven't looked very far then. He's made hundreds of attacks on
editors in page moves and username creations. I won't say what they are, but
I assure you, they are nasty.
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)