On 26 March 2010 08:57, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Given that WikiProjects generally will have a
better idea of the
character and contributions of participants (compared to those whose
idea of RfA is an extended box-ticking process), I'd like to see
projects look around and nominate some of their stalwarts who don't yet
have the mop and bucket.
Anecdotally, I see a lot of people decline the opportunity because the
RFA gauntlet is so obnoxious.
Looking around, reform of RfA seems to have been thought of seriously in
2006, but perhaps not since. [[Wikipedia:Admin coaching]] has offered
one solution: is this not being productive? One thing that occurs to me
is that a self-test page could be useful.
Charles