Well, if you wanted to write a well referenced article
on a baby that was saved from drowning by a family
dog, and could really make it easily verifiable, I
would not try to deleted it. I certainly don't think
this should be our priority, but I don't think it
would do any harm. No one who was not looking for it
would find it in any event.
Mark
--- Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
Mark Richards wrote:
Yes, anything verifiable and factual should.
'Notable'
is just someones POV about what they think is
important.
I think you inclusionist folks severely
underestimate just how much
ridiculous stuff is verifiable and factual. I could
start typing in
entries for everyone who died in Atlanta each die,
using the obituary
section of the local newspaper as a source, and
these are verifiable and
factual. There are plenty of "human interest"
stories published in the
paper, like "family dog saves baby from drowning!".
These are
verifiable and factual (verifiable in the
newspaper's archives), but not
notable. Etc.
-Mark
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail