--- Abe Sokolov <abesokolov(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Jimbo's "double edge sword" comment was
very well
put. Both users function
best on the Israeli-Palestinian articles when they
have each other by the
throat.
Nonsense.
Btw, Sv's Bob Dylan allusion should be leaving us
with more than the tune to
"The Times They are a'Changin'" in our heads. Made
with such decidedly bad
taste, it started to prove me right sooner than I
had expected.
Israeli-Palestinian neutrality was little more than
an equilibrium of RK and
Sv. Without RK, Sv's side's going to have a far
greater say over all the
articles than ever - which will encourage new
RK-types to invade the site in
droves.
Nonsense.
Those favoring a ban on RK are way off if they think
that the outcome is
going to be NPOV (or maybe they don't care - maybe
their reasons are solely
personal and ideological). I can understand that -
I'd much rather work with
the more reasonable Sv (whose worldview is by and
large is far closer to
mine than RK's is)- but that's not in Wikipedia's
interests as a whole.
Nonsense.
Respectfully,
~S~
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com