On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:28:39 -0700, Dante Alighieri
<dalighieri(a)digitalgrapefruit.com> gave utterance to the following:
At 08:10 AM 10/15/2003, Erik wrote:
At the point the logo was updated, there was
virtually unanimous
consensus
that the Nohat variant was an improvement (20 in favor, 2 against). This
satisfied the condition of the last stage of our contest, namely,
optimization by consensus. As in all such consensus discussions, only
interested parties participate. If you had looked around on Meta, you
would have noticed that these discussions have been going on since Oct
1.
What do you think where the variant submissions came from? The variant
process was broadly advertised at least on the English Wikipedia.
That's all well and good. There's just one problem. The submission of
logos was announced on the main page of the Wikipedia. The voting for
logos was announced on the main page of the W. The second round of
voting was announced on the main page of the W. The final selection was
announced on the main page of the W.
Where was the revision process announced?
On the main page of the Wikipedia. Otherwise I woudn't have found it.
--
Richard Grevers
Between two evils always pick the one you haven't tried