Bryan Derksen wrote:
There's an ArbCom election coming up, can you
imagine the damage that
would be done to ArbCom's credibility if it were to come out afterward
that members that were up for election were involved in this and their
involvement was known but we weren't told about it before voting?
*I* am involved in multiple ongoing private discussions with dozens of
people. The list in question is being badly misrepresented as some kind
of problem. It is a good list, and the purpose of the list is good, and
not everyone on the list is perfect (as is always true).
--Jimbo