On 03/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:29:50 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
No, we're not reproducing the contents of Top
Gear in its entirety. Not
even remotely close.
We are, however, listing the cool wall in its entirety. If we list
the Top Ten singles chart in its entirety, we violate copyright. If
we list all the number one hits, it has also been stated we violate
that copyright.
That's interesting.
So it *is* OK to have a thousand and something articles that all state
"this song was number one in the UK from (x) to (y)", but it *is not*
OK to have a single article listing them all in chronological order?
And if that is the case, how does the succession box fit in?