On 10/19/06, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
"Critics of the GPL often describe it as being
"viral"<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft#Is_copyleft_.22viral.22.3F>,
based on the GPL terms that all derived works must in turn be licensed under
the GPL." (from [[GNU General Public License]])
What should we do with that? {{fact}} tag it? Remove it? Leave it as
is? Personally I'd say it should be removed. I just removed, without
logging in, the whole paragraph, which was nothing more than speculation
regarding this "perception". Let's see what happens.
21:59, 19 October
2006<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GNU_General_Public_Licens…
75.202.44.46<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contribut…
Talk<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:75.202.44.46&am…
) ({{fact}})
22:18, 19 October
2006<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GNU_General_Public_Licens…
Haeleth <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Haeleth>
(
Talk<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Haeleth>|
contribs<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions…
) (rv deletion with misleading edit summary)
I'm not at all surprised. This is why I usually use the {{fact}} tag.
Anthony