--- "Poor, Edmund W" <Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com> wrote:
I'm thinking of deciding this one myself.
Dr. William M. Connolley can be trusted not to abuse
admin powers, and
it's not supposed to be a big deal. He got 70% to
30%, but a lot of the
objections were irrelevant in my opinion.
I had objected vociferously at first (go ahead, look
it up ;-) but Erik
(user:Eloquence) convinced me to change my vote to
neutral. I have been
reading the comment stream, and now I feel I should
take matters into my
own hands.
Any objections?
Yes, I believe there were 29 of them (including mine).
Carbonite
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs