JAY JG said:
From:
"Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
JAY JG said:
If you think that all the people who are making boilerplate "keep"
votes in incredibly short periods of time are not actually just
mindlessly and sequentially voting "keep", but rather are people
who read the articles, consider them carefully, then like to line
up all the votes in many different tabs so that the votes all show
up on the Contributions list in as short a period of time as
possible, then no.
Now you've said there are a number of these people, and remember that
I've shown you that Ketsy is by no means an organised inclusionist--she
never voted on a school deletion listing before Tuesday of this week.
So who are these organised inclusionists?
Where did she find all those schools? Don't you think it was from the
Schoolwatch pages, set up and maintained by school inclusionists?
It could have been. On the other hand, it could have been that it would
have been very difficult to miss those VfD listings on Tuesday and
Wednesday. VfD was absolutely clogged. 50 is a lot of listings.
And given that Ketsy is new at this, isn't it
at least plausible that
she was responding in a robotic manner to what is very widely perceived
as some particularly robotic deletion listings by a certain editor?
I suppose, but that would still make it an example of unthinking school
inclusionist voting, wouldn't it?
Absolutely. Robotic responses to a robotic listings. Arguably all that
they deserved. ANd she like this "How is Real" chap, she's an established
Wikipedia regular who had never voted in a school deletion listing in her
life before Tuesday.
Dragon's teeth.