"Kat Walsh" <mindspillage(a)gmail.com> wrote in
message news:8e253f560601201327gbd28a80v3b8d847e9c0c0f3e@mail.gmail.com...
[snip]
I also like the idea of "speedy keep" being
more widely used; if
someone comes up with a really strong justification for why something
should not be deleted, particularly if it completely rebuts the
nominator's reason for nominating it, why waste time arguing about it?
Hmmm.
Isn't this what SnowSpinner's {{user recovery}} template was esentially all
about?
Or am I getting confused with his "expertise and deletion" notice?
Perhaps this is what a "deletion cabal"
could do: simply make the call
to speedy pull a nomination, rather than penalize the nominator. I'd
imagine anyone whose nominations were continually getting pulled for
being inappropriate would eventually start to think about them more,
no penalty necessary.
I'd think anyone who nominations were getting pulled that often should be
considered for a WP:POINT time-out...
HTH HAND
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]