On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Fred Bauder wrote:
If the problems William M. Connoley presents were
temporary, I would
not have objected to Administrator status for him. He believes a
Wikipedia article should prominently feature the "truth." While this
sounds ok on its face, in practice any method of arriving at the
truth though reference to expert editors such as himself presents
prospects of sustained conflict. Our references need to be to
reputable published information.
FB has an odd definition of NPOV. The rest of the arbcomm don't agree with it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Climate_cha…
-W.
William M Connolley | wmc(a)bas.ac.uk |
http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | (01223) 221479
If I haven't seen further, it's because giants were standing on my shoulders