OTOH quantity has a quality all of its own. So far as I know, there's no
good measure of how much text people have contributed that still remain in
the article.
It would be a really good idea to measure how many unique strings of
characters each editor has added to each article and in general. Presumably
anything that still remains is of sufficient quality for whatever level the
article is.
On 1 October 2011 16:52, Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Bod Notbod
<bodnotbod(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I still think we could do with more rewards and
maybe this damned game
has given me an answer.
More editor stats.
I think what is needed is some way to measure quality objectively. It
may be that only quantity can be measured objectively, and that
quality can only be measured subjectively. But I'd support something
that moved the focus away from quantity towards quality.
Carcharoth
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard