On 01/03/2008, Oskar Sigvardsson <oskarsigvardsson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
b) How many
images do you think is enough?
Commons doesn't work that way. It's simply a collection of free media.
Should we complain that we have too much free media?
False Commons has deleted random penis pic submissions for quite some time.
c) Are there any limits to how far your logic
should be applied?
Should we provide graphic images of felching, squicking, or for that
matter, decapitating?
Ok, I made this point before, but perhaps it didn't register: there is
absolutely NOTHING wrong with female masturbation, and to suggest that
putting up photos of female masturbation is comparable to putting up
images of someone being brutally murdered is something that I find
very offensive.
There are a lot of people who are ashamed of their sexuality, and
there are a lot of girls (and boys for that matter) who have been
taught that it is "dirty" to give yourself pleasure and their lives
have been so much poorer for it. If we are able to teach the message
that a vagina is not something dirty or shameful, that masturbation in
healthy and pleasurable, and that safe, consensual sex is something
that should be applauded, then we have done a lot of good. Being
prudish and self-censoring is supremely damaging to what we are trying
to accomplish.
Commons does not exist to push your POV on sexuality.
PS. And it's not like we shy away from putting up
pictures that deal
with executions, if they are relevant. Look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gunpowderhdq2.png
or for that matter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Saddam_execution.jpg
You can probably guess from the URL what that second one depicts.
Neither actually show decapitation. Problem is that decapitation isn't
something normally done during dissection so it won't show up there
and Category:Butchers isn't that complete yet.
--
geni