On 27 March 2012 18:05, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
Anything which is *different* between BLP and policies
for other articles,
such as a no-eventualism policy, could conceivably be a benefit.
My complaint is about BLP rules that do not do this.
"No sloppiness" applied with rigour is a quantitive difference that
makes a qualitative difference.
You seem to be arguing mathematical logic when the issue is how to
motivate humans to behave a particular way.
- d.