On 5/30/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, in the extremely unlikely event that WR
became notable, we might
want to have a link to the website on the article about the website.
That's one. I've heard one more possibility advanced so far, if there
were an arbcom case that involved evidence on WR.
With the latter, all we'd have to do is e-mail the link, or a
screenshot of the post, to the ArbCom.
Both of which are much better solutions, since there's no guarantee
that such a post would stay up very long, once revealed. As far as I
can tell, the only way to 100% ensure WR will keep a post up is if you
send them an e-mail insisting they take it down because it is
slanderous or libellous.