Jimbo wrote:
Anything released under FDL 1.x or 2.0 with no
invariant sections, no Front-Cover texts, and no
Back-Cover texts can be distributed under the
terms of LFDL 2.0 *or* FDL 2.0. Anything release
under FDL 1.x with invariant sections can be released
under FDL 2.0.
And then LFDL can be simpler and worded carefully
so as to maximize compatibility with CC SA.
Hm. I think you may be on to something here that we could all agree with; I
get the simplicity and internal copy/paste harmony within Wikimedia that I
want, and Toby et al get to redistribute any Wikimedia material under the CC
Att/SA.
But will it work? Could we wholesale relicense all Wikimedia content under the
LFDL if FDL 2.0 said we could?
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)