2007/8/27, Florian Straub <Flominator(a)gmx.net>et>:
"Bryan Tong Minh"
<bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com> wrote on Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:08:43 +0200:
I still don't see why the {{flickrreview}}
should be included this
way. It breaks the entire Flickrreview system. '''Only''' admins
and
[[Commons:Flickr images/reviewers|designated users]] are allowed to
fill in the flickrreview tag. They are absolutely not the same as the
reviewer parameter to {{Flickr}}. I think it should be removed from
the Flickr template.
What's exactly the difference?
The reviewer in {{Flickr}} has checked the usability of the image for
Commons - whether it is a good picture, what it shows, etcetera. The
reviewer in {{flickrreview}} has checked the copyright status of the
picture - what license it is under.
I have to add two remarks here:
* The current situation is that the 'reviewer' parameter is not shown
at all, which I think is also not the intention. I would have liked to
correct it myself, but the template is protected and I am not an admin
any more.
* The images from FlickrLickr (which are the ones that have this
image) are pre-selected on having the desired license (CC-BY). I think
it would not be a bad idea to re-add the {{flickrreview}} template,
but with the flickrreviewer specified Eloquence or FlickrLickr rather
than the FlickrLickr-reviewer.
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels