Anyway, TLDR on the rantier comments (including my own); I'm starting to
think that entering wikitext is probably a bad idea; what we need is an
autocompleting drop-down of all the licenses used on Commons.
1) Is it fair to say that a license that's within Category:License_tags
is okay with Commons? Or if it isn't, will some procedure eventually
remove or relicense all items uploaded under that license?
2) Do we need anything other than autocompleting those template titles?
On 9/18/11 1:59 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The texts indicating licenses are localised at
translatewiki.net
<http://translatewiki.net>. Consequently there is no need for templates
and localised texts will appear daily thanks to the LocalisationUpdate
process.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 September 2011 01:41, Benjamin Chen <cnchenminqi(a)gmail.com
<mailto:cnchenminqi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh well, I might interpreted wrongly. Anyway, what about, at least,
hundreds of PD templates?
Best,
[[User:Bencmq]] / Benjamin Chen
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Benjamin Chen
<cnchenminqi(a)gmail.com <mailto:cnchenminqi@gmail.com>> wrote:
On textSat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
<tobias.oelgarte(a)googlemail.com
<mailto:tobias.oelgarte@googlemail.com>> wrote:
The more licenses we
allow, the more difficult will be the reusing. (A book with
50 license
texts in the appendix?)
I recommend you take a look at the last line of the {{self}}
template. Which is
/You may select the license of your choice./
Best,
[[User:Bencmq]] / Benjamin Chen
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l