Andrew Turvey schrieb:
----- "Yann Forget" <yann(a)forget-me.net> wrote:
From: "Yann Forget"
<yann(a)forget-me.net>
Py mouss wrote:
> The license of the site (
http://euobserver.com/static/terms) seems
to be
incompatible with the use of pictures licensed CC-BY-SA, no ?
What the license of the site has to do with the image ?
The site is certainly not a derivative of the image, so I don't see the
relation.
Whilst I'd never pretend to know anything about copyright, that would
also be my interpretation. The "SA" in CC-BY-SA refers to derivative
works - i.e. where you change, modify, etc the picture itself. Merely
putting the CC-BY-SA picture next to text doesn't create a derivative
work, so the text would not have to be CC-BY-SA'd
This is a matter of much debate and disagreement, as old as copyleft licenses.
It's "strong" or "viral" copyleft vs. "weak" or
"soft" copyleft. Traditionally,
the FSF takes teh side of strong copyleft with the GFDL, and the CC crowd tends
more towards the weak variant, implying that the share-alike requirement does
not apply to "aggregate" works, only "true" derivatives. To me, that
makes more
sense in practice, even though it may be less desierable in principle. The
distinction is tricky, however.
-- daniel