Sherool wrote:
While such licences are free-ish I don't think
they would fall fully
within the definition of free content (thouh IANAL). Either way they would
not be compatable with the GFDL licence, since it does not put any
restrictions on who can use a work or for what purpose, and unless I'm
mistaken GFDL compatability is the acid test for wether or not something
is allowed on Commons.
Not really, even CC-BY-SA isn't compatible with GFDL.
--
Ausir
Wikipedia, wolna encyklopedia
http://pl.wikipedia.org