Hello,
Michael Maggs wrote:
Flatbed scanners can be good, but only if they are of
the (much more
expensive) type that has an additional light in the lid as well as under
the glass.
Michael
David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/5/8 Jon Davis <wiki(a)konsoletek.com>om>:
>
>> Not exactly a recommendation but a suggestion of something to avoid: There
>> are a number of flatbed scanners that have "film scanner" attachments.
If
>> you plan on scanning a lot of negatives I'd suggest not buying something
>> like this because they are typically very slow.
>
> They're also completely awful and give terrible results. I know this
> one from the "negative holder" that came with my flatbed scanner ...
Yes, after a long search, I finally decided to ask a professional
protographer to digitize my old films and slides instead of buying a
scanner. For film, it comes to about 0.25 € per image, and 0.50 € per
slide. I found cheaper on the web, but I don't know about the quality.
> - d.
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre
http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres