On 5/30/07, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It says 'This page showcases a selection of the
highly skilled
photographers...' (I just now inserted 'a selection of'). Do you think
this is clear enough?
Certainly addresses the bulk of it., because it makes it clearer that
not being on this list doesn't mean you're not one of our
highly-skilled photographers. Egos and all that ...
I added a notice to the top of the talk page I had
intended to do this
once a criterion had been set. Since it seems set, for now at least, I
added the notice.
Again good.
MatthewMaggs thought to add a notice to the page
itself, but IMO it
looks unprofessional (like a press release in mid draft). Maybe I will
be overruled on this point?
Perhaps a HTML comment near the top so that it doesn't appear to
viewers but might be obvious to an editor? I don't like doing this in
general but this might be an appropriate place.
As I said, about 10 people *qualify* (and several
others within
striking distance). We're waiting for people to write profiles.
There's no rush, is there? (notwithstanding David's original post,
which is perhaps now a lapsed opportunity)
No rush, certainly. I do have a little concern about setting counts
of Featured Pictures up to be the only thing we care about. FP can be
a bit capricious about what it values at times. Not sure if I can
think of a better way to decide off-hand, though.
-Matt