Sorry Gerard, I didn't mean to rudely cut you of. My point was just that
such a policy *has* been adapted by Commons already, (before my time there
actually), while I understood Abigors question to be about where they could
find this policy and how it is implemented.
The reason why I "keep my hands clean" here is that while I don't mind the
inactivity desysop policy (If you don't use tools, you don't need them) I
certainly don't think it's a great priority (if you don't use tools, you
don't misuse them either ;) There are other work at Commons which is far
more urgent in my opinion.
Regards,
Finn R
2009/2/15 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
Hoi,
When an inconvenient truth is uttered, it is convenient not to have the
issue discussed. When people do not care to implement a policy, it can be
safely argued that there is a problem with that policy. The least that can
be said about this "policy" is that it is not universally welcomed.
When others have to do the dirty work, you have a way of keeping your hands
clean.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/2/15 Finn Rindahl <finnrindwiki(a)gmail.com>
Let's not open the whole debate again, to
(hopefully) answer Huivs
question - there is a other policy and a way to implement it, see
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Inactivity_section
There was a new run scheduled for february 6th, but it doesn't seem anyone
felt that organising this was their responsibility. (Anyone could have done
it, but everyone thought someone else would do it in so noone did). I'm
waiting for someone else myself ;)
Finn R
2009/2/15 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
Hoi,
The notion that you "have to" desysop
people when they are inactive is a
falacy on several levels. When people are trusted, they can imho be an
admin. In many ways it is an old debate but the difference is that you
delete people.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/2/15 <abigor(a)forgotten-beauty.com>
Hello,
I need some information I can't really fin don Commons.
We have a policy that says you have to do 5 admin actions in 6 months to
keep your adminship, we have sererval users that doesn't have any admin
actions for more than a year, can those user be desysoped on Meta or is
there a other policy?
Best regards,
Huiv
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l