And, seriously, David, the law, as it stands, recognises
sweat-of-the-brow. The idea that it doesn't is based on the idea that
the European Court *might*, at some point in the future, declare that
doctrine invalid.
That's not a legal argument, that's fortune telling.
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Adam Cuerden <cuerden(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear David,
I'm commenting here because I honestly didn't think Commons could be
acting in a manner that required them to actively ignore laws, and
thought it highly unlikely that Commons would be actively removing
mere requests for credit from works. That Commons apparently is doing
both of those is pretty much my limit for trying to engage with
Commons.
-Adam