On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Rob Church wrote:
On 17/06/06, Tomer Chachamu
<the.r3m0t(a)gmail.com> wrote:
/me thought image deletions were permanent for
disk-space reasons.
Why the hell does everybody seem to have thought that? There was
never, as far as I am aware, any policy related to saving disk space
that would cause that. It's simply that there was a lack of code until
now. :)
Likely (puts helpdesk hat on) because they knew that that otherwise
useful functionality wasn't provided, and in lieu of an *actual* reason
why not, they modeled it in their head, and that's what they came up
with.
Apply 'telephone' to the result; blather, wince, repeat.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra(a)baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?