[Wikipedia-l] Re: Bibliography
Karl Eichwalder
ke at gnu.franken.de
Sun Jan 9 09:51:44 UTC 2005
Jens Ropers <ropers at ropersonline.com> writes:
> In theory I'd be inclined to agree. Yet Project Gutenberg does not
> anywhere near have the "instant editability" that Wikisource has.
That's agood thing - sources do not change ;) Of course, sticking
comments to sources is another issue and that's an area where the wiki
way comes in.
> So, yes, maybe we should merge.
I forgot to mention, we already merged - I know more than one person who
contributes to both projects.
> Of course they are established, have "brand recognition" and
> have already completed lots of work, so "us *joining* them" would maybe
> be the better (more polite and palatable to them) way of putting it.
Yes, thanks for getting these things right.
> But if were to merge/join, we should bring the wiki concept along.
Yes, from time to time annoting systems are discussed on the PG
mailinglist and, of course, someone mentions WP resp. wiki*.
--
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o
| _-\_<,
| (*)/'(*)
Key fingerprint = F138 B28F B7ED E0AC 1AB4 AA7F C90A 35C3 E9D0 5D1C
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list