[Wikipedia-l] Re: Klingon resurrected

Wed Jun 9 08:41:33 UTC 2004

Erik Moeller wrote:

> It's difficult to ignore Klingon when it is plastered over 50 Main Pages  
> and added as interlanguage links to thousands of serious articles about  
> human history, politics and religion. That was always my main concern and  
> the compromise addresses this problem.
> 
And how can KlingonWP not produce the same in the long run?

> By the way, Klingon now has 5 articles, and guess what they're about?  
> Fictional worlds and concepts from Star Trek. The word "Star Trek" appears  
> in none of them, so I suspect they don't even establish that they are  
> fictional. This is the kind of Pandora's Box we are opening here.
> 
I'm afraid you are being very paranoid there.