[Wikipedia-l] Re:MBTI

Tue Jun 1 04:54:17 UTC 2004

Daniel Mayer wrote:
> --- Ray Saintonge
<saintonge-EynCeXvFgoheoWH0uzbU5w at public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> 
>>Anthere wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_by_MBTI_type
>>>
>>>How do you explain the current majority of NTs ?
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>Wikipedians are not a representative sample of the
general population. 8-)
>>
>>Ec
> 
> 
> NTs are to Wikipedia as flies are to fly paper (or
moths to a flame). ;)
> 
> -- mav 

Hmmmmmm.
Well, I hope more people will add themselves so we
improve statistics.

But after we noticed an apparent predominance of NT,
who think of

* why are those predominant ? What is the positive
feedback given to them and not given to others ?

* Are the other groups not attracted by WP ? Or are
they quickly leaving because they can't meet their
needs ? 

* is it good for wikipedia community that mostly NT
are here ? Would not we benefit of more types ? How to
attract them and *keep* them ?

* who are the groups more embarassed with trolls ? Who
could better help best with wikistress attacks ?

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 