On 26/09/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To what extent is this true under US law?
The claim to ownership of a scan from 1665 is odious. Perhaps it's just me.
Nope, I can smell it too. Although there is a bloke on the other side
of the lab who pongs a bit, so perhaps it's that. Still, sounds
dubious; if the scan itself is from 1665, then they don't have a leg
to stand on. Of course, Brad's the one with a law degree and yonks of
experience, so...
Rob Church